Post by account_disabled on Mar 4, 2024 6:46:51 GMT
The John and it just came out in a funny way that the language would be parsed on the surface as very misinterpreted. So if someone from Google says A does not equal C you might say Aha so that means B or D could equal C. There you go. B Give statements some time to be amended or modified at least a few weeks. For example youll remember that the statement about s s and s there was a statement made by Gary from Google and Gary said this.
Then just a couple weeks later he amended the statement to say Oh Greece Mobile Number List right there are also canonicalization issues which is separate maybe from ranking issues but probably you dont care because canonicalization will affect your rankings. s do help with canonicalization in Google whereas s and s might not help as much which is sort of saying Wait so they are interpreted differently and there could be some reasons why when I change s to s rankings and traffic go up. Aha. That statement took a little while to come out but it did kind of correct the record. C I like data and I like experiments over opinions and public statements. So for example a few months ago now the folks at Reboot Online did a great study about external links.
They created some fake words and built up a bunch of web pages. Some of the web pages did have external links on them. Some of them didnt. They saw that Google was extremely consistent in always ranking the ones that had externalpointing links that were followed versus external but not followed or no external links or internal links only that kind of stuff. I think their results were pretty conclusive. this statement might have been wrong. Maybe when John said it it was correct. Or maybe his second sentence is really the truth.
Then just a couple weeks later he amended the statement to say Oh Greece Mobile Number List right there are also canonicalization issues which is separate maybe from ranking issues but probably you dont care because canonicalization will affect your rankings. s do help with canonicalization in Google whereas s and s might not help as much which is sort of saying Wait so they are interpreted differently and there could be some reasons why when I change s to s rankings and traffic go up. Aha. That statement took a little while to come out but it did kind of correct the record. C I like data and I like experiments over opinions and public statements. So for example a few months ago now the folks at Reboot Online did a great study about external links.
They created some fake words and built up a bunch of web pages. Some of the web pages did have external links on them. Some of them didnt. They saw that Google was extremely consistent in always ranking the ones that had externalpointing links that were followed versus external but not followed or no external links or internal links only that kind of stuff. I think their results were pretty conclusive. this statement might have been wrong. Maybe when John said it it was correct. Or maybe his second sentence is really the truth.